Business Wire

Veeva Systems: Industry Survey Reveals Clinical Data Management Delays Are Slowing Trial Completion

Del

One of the largest, most in-depth surveys of clinical data management professionals shows that the time it takes companies to design and release clinical study databases is having a negative impact on conducting and completing trials.

This Smart News Release features multimedia. View the full release here: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170921005594/en/

Types of data companies manage in their primary EDC vs. volume of data (Graphic: Business Wire)

Types of data companies manage in their primary EDC vs. volume of data (Graphic: Business Wire)

According to the 2017 eClinical Landscape Study from Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, it takes companies an average of 68 days to build and release a clinical study database. Delays in releasing the study database are associated with an increase of nearly a month downstream for other data management processes such as patient data entry and time to lock the database at the end of the study. Respondents that deliver the database after first patient, first visit (FPFV), take nearly twice as long to enter patient data throughout the study and about 75% longer to lock the study database when compared to those that deliver the final database before FPFV.

“The study results indicate that companies face a growing number of challenges in building and managing clinical study databases,” said Ken Getz, research associate professor and director at the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development. “The results also show that the release of the clinical study database after sites have begun enrollment is associated with longer downstream cycle times at the investigative site and at study close out.”

Electronic Data Capture (EDC) Providers and System Use

EDC is the most widely adopted clinical application, used by all respondents (100%), followed by randomization and trial supply management (77%), electronic master file (70%), and safety (70%) systems. A majority (58%) of respondents use either Medidata Rave or Oracle Inform as their primary EDC system.

When asked about the type of data managed in their EDC, all (100%) CROs and sponsors cite electronic case report form (eCRF) data, followed by local lab and quality of life data (60% each). However, respondents say eCRF data is the highest volume of data they manage in their EDC system (at an average of 78% of the total data managed). The next highest data volumes reported are central lab data and local lab data at 5% each. Remaining data types reported are each 4% or less. This demonstrates the need for processes and systems to support the industry’s vision to have complete study data in their EDC.

More than three-quarters (77%) say they have issues loading data into their EDC application and most (66%) say EDC system or integration issues are the primary reasons they are unable to load study data.

Impact of Database Build Delays on Trial Cycle Times

The survey finds several common causes for clinical database build delays. Protocol changes is cited most by 45% of respondents, underscoring the challenge data management professionals have in dealing with changes as they are finalizing the clinical trial database for the start of the trial. This highlights the need to optimize the database design process with standards and systems that support more flexible design and rapid development.

Initial database delays also have significant downstream impacts on the time it takes sites to enter patient data in the EDC throughout the trial, as well as the final lock of the database once the study is complete. It takes on average five days from patient visit to when the data is entered into the EDC for companies that release the database before FPFV. When the database is released after FPFV, data entry time doubles to 10 days.

The impact of database build delays is even greater by the time companies get to database lock. Those who always release the database before FPFV get to database lock in an average of 31 days. Those who never release the database before FPFV take more than three weeks longer (54 days) to lock the database.

Sponsors take roughly 40% longer than CROs to build the database (73 vs. 53 days) and to get to database lock (39 vs. 28 days). Also, those using the two leading EDC systems report roughly 20% longer data cycle times (123 days) than those using other EDC systems (99 days), which includes time for database build (75 vs. 60 days), patient data entry (9 vs. 7 days), and database lock (39 vs. 32 days).

“Database build processes have remained largely unchanged over the past 10 years, and the process will only get more complicated as CROs and sponsors manage an increasing variety of clinical trial data,” said Richard Young, vice president of Veeva Vault EDC. “Organizations compensate for technology limitations by reducing the volume of data they input. Our focus should be on improving EDC systems so sponsors and CROs are no longer limited, and instead can run the trial they want.”

The 2017 eClinical Landscape Study: Assessing Data Management Practices, Performance, and Challenges from Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, sponsored by Veeva Systems (NYSE: VEEV), reviews the state of data management in life sciences with an in-depth look at the insights and opinions of clinical data management professionals at more than 250 companies, including sponsors and CROs, with an average of 17 years of experience in clinical data management. Download the report at veeva.com/eu/EDCSurvey.

About the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development

The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development at Tufts University provides strategic information to help drug developers, regulators, and policy makers improve the quality and efficiency of pharmaceutical development, review, and utilization. Tufts CSDD, based in Boston, conducts a wide range of in-depth analyses on pharmaceutical issues and hosts symposia, workshops, and public forums, and publishes Tufts CSDD Impact Reports, a bi-monthly newsletter providing analysis and insight into critical drug development issues. For more information, visit csdd.tufts.edu.

About Veeva Systems

Veeva Systems Inc. is a leader in cloud-based software for the global life sciences industry. Committed to innovation, product excellence, and customer success, Veeva has more than 550 customers, ranging from the world's largest pharmaceutical companies to emerging biotechs. Veeva is headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area, with offices in Europe, Asia, and Latin America. For more information, visit veeva.com/eu.

Research Highlights

2017 eClinical Landscape Study:

Assessing Data Management Practices, Performance, and Challenges

The 2017 eClinical Landscape Study examines the state of clinical data management in the life sciences industry. The goal of the research is to understand current clinical data management practices and assess the performance and challenges of electronic data capture (EDC) systems.

One of the largest, most in-depth clinical data management studies to date, this research captures the insights and opinions of 250 clinical data management professionals, including sponsors and CROs with an average of 17 years of clinical data management experience.

Clinical Systems and EDC Data Landscape

  • EDC applications are the most prevalent clinical applications, used by all (100%) respondents, followed by randomization and trial supply management (77%), safety/pharmacovigilance (70%), electronic trial master file (eTMF) (70%), and clinical trial management (CTMS) (61%) systems.
  • A majority (58%) of respondents use Medidata Rave or Oracle Inform as their primary EDC application. No other application was used by more than 6% of organizations.
  • While all respondents use an EDC system, roughly one-third (32%) use paper case report forms (CRFs), indicating these organizations still rely on manual processes to manage data during their clinical trials.
  • Organizations say they manage a wide range of data types in their primary EDC system including eCRF (100%), local lab (60%), quality of life (60%), central lab (57%), and ePRO (34%) data. Only 10% of companies have genomic data or mobile health data in their EDC.
  • While companies have variety of data types in their EDC, respondents say the largest proportion of the data in their EDC system is eCRF data (estimated at 78% of total data managed). All other data types were each estimated at 5% or less of the total volume of data in the EDC, including local lab data (5%), central lab data (5%), quality of life data (4%), and ePRO data (3%). Genomic data and mobile health data make up the smallest portion of data in EDC systems at 0.4% and 0.3% respectively.

Clinical Data Management Cycle Times

  • On average, it takes 68 days to build and release a study database, 8 days from patient visit to enter data in the EDC system throughout the study, and 36 days from the study’s last patient visit to database lock.
  • Sponsors, as well as those using the two most prevalent EDC applications (Medidata Rave and Oracle Inform), report longer times to build and release the study database and to lock the database after last patient, last visit.
    • Average number of days to build and release the database:
      • 73 days for sponsors vs. 53 days for CROs
      • 75 days for those using the two most widely used EDC systems vs. 60 days for those using other EDC systems
    • Average number of days to lock the study database:
      • 39 days for sponsors vs. 28 days for CROs
      • 39 days for those using the two most widely used EDC systems vs. 32 days for those using other EDC systems

Clinical Study Database Build Times and the Impact on Clinical Trial Cycle Times

  • The up-front time it takes to build and release the clinical database has potentially significant impacts on downstream processes, including time to enter patient data in the EDC throughout the study and time to final database lock after last patient, last visit.
    • It takes on average five days from patient visit to when the data is entered into the EDC for companies that release the database before FPFV, and database lock time is 31 days.
    • It takes on average 10 days from patient visit to when the data is entered into the EDC for companies that release the database after FPFV, and database lock time is 54 days.
  • Nearly one-third (32%) of sponsors “often” or “always” release their EDC after FPFV has occurred, compared to 20% of CROs.
  • One-third (36%) of those using the two most prevalent EDC applications “often” or “always” release their EDC after FPFV has occurred, compared to 22% of those using other EDC applications.

Top Causes for Database Build Delays and Data Loading Challenges

  • The most common cause for database build delays is protocol changes (45%), followed by user acceptance testing (17%), and database design functionality (15%).
  • Database build delays due to protocol changes are higher among CROs (52%) than sponsors (44%). Whereas database build delays due to design functionality are lower among CROs (7%) than sponsors (18%).
  • Database build delays due to database design functionality is associated with significantly longer time to lock the database after last, patient last visit (50 days vs. the 36-day average).
  • Three-quarters of respondents (77%) have issues that prevent them from loading data into their primary EDC system. Most (66%) cite EDC system issues or integration issues as the top challenges that prevent them from loading data.

###

Contact information

For Veeva Systems Inc.
Sue Glanville / Cate Bonthuys
sue@catalystcomms.co.uk / cate@catalystcomms.co.uk
+44 (0) 7715 817589 / +44 (0) 7746 546773
or
Rachel Stanton
Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development
+1-617-636-2170
rachel.stanton@tufts.edu

Om Business Wire

Business Wire
Business Wire
24 Martin Lane
EC4R 0DR London

+44 20 7626 1982http://www.businesswire.co.uk

(c) 2018 Business Wire, Inc., All rights reserved.

Business Wire, a Berkshire Hathaway company, is the global leader in multiplatform press release distribution.

Følg saker fra Business Wire

Registrer deg med din epostadresse under for å få de nyeste sakene fra Business Wire på epost fortløpende. Du kan melde deg av når som helst.

Siste saker fra Business Wire

Ant Financial to Share Full Suite of AI Capabilities with Asset Management Companies20.6.2018 01:10Pressemelding

Ant Financial Services Group (“Ant Financial” or “the Company”) today announced that the Company will share a full suite of AI capabilities with asset management companies in China to support their digital transformation. Following its successful launch last year, Caifuhao, an AI-powered corporate account on the Ant Fortune platform, has brought tangible benefits to 27 fund management companies. “By combining Ant Financial’s AI technologies with the capabilities of asset management companies in investor education and fund management, together we are making customized wealth management services more accessible for ordinary users,” said Eric Jing, Executive Chairman and CEO of Ant Financial. With the support of AI-powered services offered by their Caifuhao account, including operational optimization, content generation, compliance and risk management, 27 fund management companies have been able to increase their operational efficiency by 70% while reducing their overall costs by 50%. Add

Avalara Announces Closing of Initial Public Offering and Full Exercise of the Underwriters’ Option to Purchase Additional Shares19.6.2018 21:20Pressemelding

Avalara, Inc. (NYSE: AVLR) today announced the closing of its initial public offering of 8,625,000 shares of common stock, including the full exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase 1,125,000 additional shares of common stock, at a price to the public of $24.00 per share. The shares began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on June 15, 2018 under the symbol “AVLR.” Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, J.P. Morgan, and BofA Merrill Lynch acted as book-running managers for the offering. JMP Securities, KeyBanc Capital Markets, and Stifel acted as co-managers. The offering was made only by means of a prospectus. Copies of the final prospectus related to the offering may be obtained from Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Prospectus Department, 200 West Street, New York, NY 10282, or by telephone at 866-471-2526, or by email at prospectus-ny@ny.email.gs.com, or from J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, c/o Broadridge Financial Solutions, 1155 Long Island Avenue, Edgewood, NY 11717, or by telephone at

Unilever Calls on Content Creators and Distributors to Eradicate Stereotypes19.6.2018 17:42Pressemelding

Unilever is calling on content creators and distributors to act now to eliminate outdated stereotypes. The move marks the latest step in the company’s industry-leading Unstereotype initiative, which launched two years ago with the aim of eliminating harmful and diminishing portrayals of people across advertising. As part of its Unstereotype commitment Unilever is expanding that initiative across all forms of content and branded entertainment, and today announces a three-year multi-million-dollar deal with Rexona, the world’s biggest deodorant brand, and Simon Fuller’s XIX Entertainment. Rexona (also known as Sure, Degree and Shield depending on the country) will partner with NOW UNITED, the first ever global pop group comprised of 14 artists from 14 countries including Brazil, China, Germany, India, Philippines, Senegal, US and UK. Together, will co-create content across multiple channels that unites different cultures through the joy of dance, celebrating movement and inspiring people

Universal Laser Systems Expands Its Materials Database with Henkel, Hexcel and Saint-Gobain Materials19.6.2018 12:05Pressemelding

Universal Laser Systems (ULS) announces the addition of Henkel, Hexcel® and Saint-Gobain materials to its materials database, the most extensive repository of laser material processing parameters for materials in the range of 10 watts to 500 watts. The Henkel, Hexcel and Saint-Gobain materials new to the ULS materials database were specifically added for laser processing with the ULTRA and XLS platforms, suited for high accuracy and precision laser cutting, laser ablation and laser surface modification. The materials include: Henkel Bergquist™ Gap Pad® VO Thermal Material Henkel Bergquist™ Hi-Flow® 105 Thermal Material Henkel LOCTITE® EA 7000 AERO Film Henkel Hysol® EA 9696 AERO Film Henkel Bergquist™ Sil-Pad A2000 Thermal Material Hexcel® HexForce® 353 Aramid Fabric Hexcel® HexForce® 282 Carbon Fabric Saint-Gobain CHEMFILM® DF100 Cast PTFE Film Saint-Gobain CHEMFILM® ETFE-E2 Extruded Fluoropolymer Film Laser processing notes, describing the results of the laser-material interaction fo

Valence Advises Itaúsa on Sale of Brazilian Chemical Co Elekeiroz to H.I.G. Capital19.6.2018 11:57Pressemelding

The Valence Group acted as advisor to Itaúsa on its sale of Brazilian chemical company Elekeiroz for R$160 million (EV), reduced by the net debt and proportionate to its shareholding (96.5% of total capital stock). The Company is a leading local producer of oxo-alcohols, plasticizers and anhydrides. About Itaúsa Itaúsa is a Brazilian holding company which controls several companies active in areas such as the financial sector; industries include wood panels, bathroom fittings and fixtures; infra-structure; and retail. It is one of the largest private conglomerates in Brazil and one of the largest in the world. About Elekeiroz Founded in 1894 and headquartered in Várzea Paulista – São Paulo, Elekeiroz operates in the chemicals manufacturing market. Through two production sites in Várzea Paulista and Camaçari – Bahia, the Company’s portfolio includes Oxo-Alcohols, Plasticizers, Phthalic & Maleic Anhydrides, Sulfuric Acid and other by-products. Elekeiroz has a diversified client base, com

Dole Adds Industry Veteran Michael Solomon as President of Dole Fresh Vegetables19.6.2018 10:00Pressemelding

Dole Food Company, Inc. announced the appointment of Michael H. Solomon as the new President of Dole Fresh Vegetables effective June 18, 2018. As Dole Fresh Vegetables President, Solomon will have responsibility for all of the division's operations across North America. He will report directly to Dole Food Company President and Chief Executive Officer Johan Linden. With 30 years experience, including within the food and beverage industry, Solomon has a proven success record of taking high-performance brands to the next level, increasing performance and margins in sales, plant operations, and profit growth. Among other positions, Solomon has held roles of President of POM Wonderful and President and CEO of Ready Pac Foods, Inc., prior to joining Dole. “Michael has built an impressive track record of strategic, operational and commercial accomplishments,” said Johan Linden, President and Chief Executive Officer of Dole Food Company. “He has considerable experience and knowledge of the fr